Here’s some comfort if you discover a supervisor has made unwise comments to employees: Ambiguous statements probably aren’t enough to form the basis of a hostile work environment claim.
Recent case: Kenneth Huggins, who is black, sued after the school district he worked for investigated student allegations that he had sexually harassed them.
Huggins sued, claiming a hostile environment because his supervisor said his car was “a bomb.” Huggins said the statement was racially based. He also said the sexual harassment charge was retaliation.
The court disagreed and dismissed the case. The supervisor’s statement wasn’t enough evidence to show that the environment was hostile. Plus—because students made the harassment claims—employer retaliation wasn’t valid. (Huggins v. Coatesville Area Schools, No. 10-4484, 3rd Cir., 2011)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Snoozing on the job? Discipline OK under ADA
- Good news: EEOC doesn't have the last word in deciding discrimination cases
- When cooperation drops as discipline escalates, OK to fire for insubordination
- Not every romantic advance equals harassment