Not every injury causes a disabling condition that qualifies for ADA protection.
Recent case: Nathan Morphew worked as a project manager. He injured his back in a workplace fall. Several days later, he sought treatment with a chiropractor who restricted lifting to no more than 20 pounds.
Morphew was terminated shortly after during a purported reduction in force. He sued, alleging that he was fired because of his disability. The employer argued that it neither considered Morphew disabled nor was he disabled.
The court agreed. It said a minor lifting restriction wasn’t enough to trigger ADA protection.
Plus, Morphew could clearly still do his job without any accommodations since his work didn’t require any lifting. (Morphew v. Lawhon & Associates, No. 2:10-CV-716, SD OH, 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/29556/minor-lifting-restriction-doesnt-mean-ada-disability "
- What to do when execs undermine your HR policies
- 2 small companies, 1 owner: Could we be covered by the FMLA?
- The 6 kinds of terminations ... and how to avoid lawsuits for each one
- Lawnside settles police dept. bias case for $350,000
- What could get in the way of a settlement that prevents all possible future claims?