If subjective criteria like attitude, and being a team player are part of your organization’s , you’d be wise to keep detailed records of customer complaints.
That way, if an employee later challenges your use of “soft” or subjective evaluation measures, you can pull out the complaints to show how you arrived at your opinion.
Recent case: Al Smith, a black male, was discharged as part of a larger work force reduction (WFR) at Hewlett-Packard (H-P). It was the second WFR the company had conducted in a very short time period; Smith had survived the first.
H-P based its WFR discharge list on supervisor evaluations that included both objective and subjective assessments. Smith was ranked very low in the areas of attitude, customer relations and .
He sued, alleging race discrimination. But H-P backed up its assessment with copies of customer complaints, including a series of e-mails criticizing Smith’s attitude, and evidence that he bad-mouthed other team members to customers. This was ample evidence to back up his supervisor’s conclusions about Smith’s lack of . The case was dismissed. (Smith v. Hewlett-Packard, No. 3:05-CV-1123, ND TX, 2007)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- Discipline sexist supervisors--and keep them far away from any disciplinary decisions
- Never automatically fire employees just because they exhaust FMLA leave
- No need to reinstate if disability leave extends past FMLA
- Inflated Evaluation Deflates the Company's Wallet