A woman who worked for the Philadelphia Water Department lost her claim because she did not meet the basic employment qualifications.
The woman’s attendance was erratic and triggered . Her supervisor suspended her, showing that she had worked only 885 hours during a 12-month period. The woman requested an additional 20-day leave of absence to attend an alcohol rehabilitation program, but she did not complete a written FMLA request for the leave.
Fifteen days later, the city fired her for abandoning her job.
The federal District Court, Eastern District ruled she did not qualify for the FMLA because she did not work the required 1,250 hours in the year before her leave. She argued that the city should have notified her of her FMLA status, but employers are not required to do so.
The court found that the city had met its obligations by posting properly on office bulletin boards and in city publications.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- You can rely on 'negative' FMLA certification
- Suspect FMLA mischief? Use certification rights before taking drastic action
- For new mom with very ill baby, what are our FMLA and unemployment obligations?
- Firing OK if FMLA return date isn't honored