A federal court has ruled that work done by civilly committed sex offenders as part of their treatment program is exempt from the minimum wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act ().
Recent case: James Martin lives in a sex offenders treatment community that’s part of a Minnesota program allowing offenders to work. Participants keep half their earnings; the treatment program retains the rest.
Martin sued, alleging he was entitled to all his wages. The program argued it wasn’t an ordinary employer—Martin is more like a prisoner, whose work inside a prison is not covered by the FLSA.
The court concluded that Martin wasn’t covered because the work program was designed specifically for treatment. If it were competing in the open marketplace against other companies, it would have to pay the minimum wage. (Martin v. Benson, No. 11-465, DC MN, 2011)
- Adjust internal pay scales to end sex bias
- Buying a business? You may be on hook for old violations
- Special analysis: Worker status issues expand beyond payroll
- Be ready to explain male/female pay disparity—dating back to the time salaries began to diverge
- States become key battleground in the minimum wage fight