Employees who fear they’re facing disciplinary action may quit. Then they argue that they would have been fired and quit preemptively, so they’re eligible for unemployment compensation.
But if the employer can show there really was no good reason for the employee to think her job was in danger, then the employee can’t receive unemployment.
Recent case: Peggy Wilmore retired from the Postal Service about eight months after getting a new supervisor. She then applied for unemployment, claiming the supervisor threatened her and forced her to quit.
But the supervisor said no one ever told Wilmore her job was in danger. That was enough to make her ineligible for benefits. The court ruled she voluntarily left work without a good reason. (Wilmore v. Board of Review, No. A-0628-10T4, Superior Court of New Jersey, 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/29056/no-unemployment-for-employee-who-quits-to-retire "
Related Articles...
- Supreme Court: Oral complaints have retaliation protection, too
- Whistle-blowers protected for flagging shareholder fraud
- Lessons from SHRM: Plaintiff's lawyer reveals trade secrets HR pros need to know
- Managing today's workforce: Teenagers and sexual harassment
- Small business? Use tax credit to help pay for insurance






