Businesses come and go, especially during tough economic times. But sometimes companies just change names and corporate status, while essentially remaining the same entity. That doesn’t mean their legal obligations just disappear.
Recent case: Felicity Little was fired from her job with a small building-supply company the day before she was scheduled to return from. She sued the company, which had gone out of business between the time of her discharge and the time she sued.
Little’s lawyers argued this was just subterfuge to avoid liability. The court said the case could go forward. It checked North Carolina corporate records and saw that the same owners resumed business under another name. (Little v. Stock Building Supply, et al., No. 4:10-CV-129, ED NC, 2011)
- Appeals court: No serial litigation for related claims
- 'Reasonable' Maternity Leave Doesn't Matter Under FMLA
- Indefinite suspension is retaliation, even without discharge
- Offer alternatives to reporting discrimination straight up the 'chain of command'
- So an employee tells you she's seriously ill ... now what?