Employers can establish reasonable dress code requirements, including grooming standards. However, it’s not an absolute right. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, employers must make reasonable accommodations for sincerely held religious beliefs.
If an employee cites religious reasons for not complying with the dress code, look further. Don’t automatically discipline.
Recent case: Dennis Sistrunk, a practicing Rastafarian who wears his hair in dreadlocks, worked for the Camden County Workforce Investment Board (WIB). The WIB had a dress and grooming policy that required a neat appearance.
When Sistrunk was told to dress neatly, he bought the appropriate clothing.
But when he was told to cut off his dreadlocks, he said he couldn’t because of his religion. He went home and was fired when he didn’t show up to work for three days. He sued, alleging religious discrimination.
The court ordered a trial, concluding that a jury should decide whether Sistrunk had a legitimate religious belief and whether the WIB should have worked with him to accommodate it. (Sistrunk v. Camden County Workforce Investment Board, No. 1:05-CV-1506, DC NJ, 2007)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/2894/when-religion-may-prevent-dress-code-compliance-check-further-before-discipline "
- Feds offer partial amnesty for contractor misclassification
- Hospital didn't discriminate during downsizing, court rules
- Lessons from the 2006 SHRM conference: Online-Only Handbooks: a risky legal proposition
- York County official claims hard times led her to steal
- Supreme Court follows Ledbetter logic in AT&T pregnancy discrimination case