A Chicago ambulance service has decided to settle a lawsuit after a federal judge nixed the novel argument that some other company must have been responsible for alleged sexual harassment of its employees.
Several current and former female employees of Jay Medicar accused a former manager of demanding sex in return for favorable assignments and pay raises. In March 2010, the EEOC sued on the women’s behalf. Conciliation efforts failed and the case was scheduled to go to trial.
That’s when the company’s attorneys moved to have the lawsuit dismissed. Their reasoning: When the alleged harassment occurred, the company was incorporated as Jay Medi-car. The lawyers argued that the current Jay Medicar was not a “successor in interest” to the old company and therefore not liable for the harassment.
Federal Judge William Hibbler was unpersuaded by the missing hyphen, ruling that the case should go forward. That’s when the company’s owners decided to settle, agreeing to pay the women $70,000.
Note: The ambulance company—whatever it’s called—might have saved that $70,000 and whatever it paid its crack legal team by quickly investigating the women’s complaints and fixing any problems.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/28892/whats-in-a-name-legal-settlement-just-the-same "
- Court carves out another age-bias class: Employees age 50 and older
- The changing face of the ADA: Complying with the new amendments
- Workers at smallest firms using 'public policy' loophole to file suits
- Disabled employee can't work at all? You can terminate without violating FEHA
- Accommodate workers' eating needs when it's medically necessary