An inventory manager lost a discrimination lawsuit against the Atlanta Community Food Bank because he failed to meet the ADA’s disability standard. The man suffered an arm injury on the job and returned to work two months later on 20 percent partial disability, which was later raised to 50 percent.
When the manager was subsequently demoted as part of a restructuring of the business, he complained about his reduced pay. Two days later, a customer informed the food bank’s that the manager had offered to sell her a pallet of detergent for cash. When management asked the customer to agree to the sale, the manager was arrested, cash in hand, and fired.
When the disability case made it to court, the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, ruled that the manager failed to show that his arm injury substantially limited the major life function of doing manual labor, or that those limits were substantial. As such, he did not qualify as disabled under the ADA.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/2878/employee-caught-in-detergent-sting-loses-disability-case "
- Does a co-worker have an annoying habit?
- Former Bells bank worker files age discrimination suit
- Consent required to run background checks on internal applicants?
- Terminated employee claims discrimination? Warn managers against any sort of retaliation
- 6 years is long enough: Are quick dismissals on the way following 7th Circuit's rebuke?