When disgruntled applicants or former employees file frivolous lawsuits, they often act as their own lawyers in court. So-called pro se litigants can’t go far unless the court agrees to waive their court fees. To stop meritless cases from clogging up appeals dockets, more and more federal judges are refusing to waive court fees.
Recent case: Reginald Hunter claimed he wasn’t hired by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs because he is disabled. He also claimed his test scores, though low, were faked. Hunter represented himself.
The trial judge dismissed his case because he cited no facts. Then the judge said an appeal could not be undertaken in good faith; he refused to allow Hunter to appeal without paying the hefty filing fees. (Hunter v. Department of Veterans Affairs, No. 1:11-CV-2065, ND OH, 2011)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Don't cave to telecommuting request if it won't allow disabled employee to do job
- Texas high court rejects employer liability for worker conduct
- Is it OK to use SSNs as ID numbers?
- Can you fire someone for his online (but off-Duty) actions?