Employers can shorten the time employees have to sue by stipulating uniform claims timeframes that cover all disputes. However, you must be very specific about what’s covered.
Recent case: Janessa Smith signed an employment application that said she agreed to bring all claims arising out of her employment no later than six months after “the date of the employment action.” Smith was fired shortly after she called the police to report what she believed was wrongdoing.
She filed a Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA) lawsuit, alleging retaliation within the law’s one-year statute of limitations. But the company said she waited too long.
The court disagreed. It said that the application wasn’t specific enough on what it meant. It should have mentioned employment claims by name and made it clear what was being waived. (Smith v. TA Operating, No. 10-2563, DC NJ, 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/28202/be-specific-when-crafting-claims-agreement-documents "
- N.Y. Department of Labor issues new WARN Act regs
- Union members can't use 'Public policy' violation as basis for retaliation claim
- Supreme Court: Check boss bias before discipline
- Beware of allowing on-site solicitations
- Prepare for parades, pickets and bullhorns: Court lifts limits on many strike activities