In what the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) labels a "landmark" settlement, retailer Abercrombie & Fitch is shelling out nearly $50 million to settle three employment discrimination suits.
The lawsuits alleged that Abercrombie discriminates against minorities and women by encouraging its 700 stores to hire sales reps who maintain the "A&F Look" of white, male and preppy. Employees who didn't have the look were demoted, moved to backroom jobs or fired, the complaints said.
Employment attorneys say the cases represent a different twist in job-bias charges. Typically, discrimination suits focus on age, race or gender. The Abercrombie cases targeted the company's brand-marketing process through its hiring: a kind of "image" discrimination.
The message: Very few jobs satisfy the requirement that "looks" are a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) necessary to perform the job. One exception: If you're hiring models, you could argue that a certain appearance is a BFOQ. But if you're simply trying to make employees part of your marketing image, don't allow that goal to trample on age-, race- or sex-bias laws.
- Philly area McDonald's will pay disabled worker $90,000
- Dress, grooming policies should serve bona fide business need
- Do oral complaints carry the same weight as written complaints in retaliation cases?
- Another Manhattan chef stirs up a discrimination suit
- Use 'no-reapplication' clause to settle discrimination cases once and for all