Coca-Cola has received the court’s blessing for its diversity efforts in the wake of a landmark 1999 discrimination lawsuit that cost the company $192.5 million. In December, a U.S. district court judge ruled that the company had complied with all its legal obligations under the settlement agreement.
For the past five years, the company’s been under the watchful eye of an independent task force. During that time, Coca-Cola boosted minority representation among salaried employees from 26 percent to nearly 35 percent, among middle from 21 to 27 percent and among elected and appointed officers from 8 to 21 percent.
Coke CEO Neville Isdell said it’s not about statistics, however. “The end point is that you have a totally diverse work force that is not put into compartmentalized boxes,” he says.
District Judge Richard Story issued a warning along with the judgment, saying it was now up to Coke employees to ensure the reforms stick.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/2551/cokes-diversity-reforms-judge-rules-its-the-real-thing "
- Warn bosses: Preconceived notions about disability can violate the ADA
- Co-worker romance: Set a policy that balances rights, liability
- Hiring: Sometimes, personal questions are OK
- Quitting time? Performance improvement plan not enough to justify discrimination lawsuit
- How strict is your dress and grooming policy?