A former Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) administrator recently won a four-year battle over alleged racial discrimination and retaliation charges against the agency and U.S. Justice Department. He won $85,000 in damages, plus legal fees.
Sandalio Gonzalez claimed that a transfer to Texas was retaliation for bringing DEA wrongdoing to light. Formerly second-in-command in the DEA’s South Florida office overseeing 300 agents, Gonzalez was transferred to El Paso, Texas, where he was top administrator in charge of 150 agents. The DEA called it a promotion, but Gonzalez said it was retaliation.
Earlier that year, Gonzalez made headlines when he accused Miami agents of covering up the disappearance of 10 kilos of cocaine from a drug search.
Advice: A landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling last summer lowered the bar on what’s considered illegal “retaliation” against employees. Remind supervisors to avoid trying get revenge against complainers and whistle-blowers.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/2548/miami-dea-officer-wins-bias-suit-claims-transfer-was-retaliation "
- Warn bosses: Do nothing that discourages FMLA leave or punishes those who take it
- 'No comment' is best response when reporters call about a firing
- Disabled staff? No need to revamp their jobs
- Handle disabled worker's poor performance like any other
- Include fair geographical and time limits in noncompete pacts