There’s a right way and a wrong way to make sure employees have a “serious” condition that qualifies for .
Right way: Ask the employee to obtain certification from a doctor. If you don’t agree with the report, schedule another evaluation with a doctor of your choice. If the two conflict, you can obtain a tie-breaking evaluation.
Wrong way: Contact the employee’s health care provider directly. The U.S. Labor Department recently ruled that “direct contact with the employee’s health care provider is prohibited.”
Recent case: Levoyer Wilson filed an Wilson v. NHB Industries suit, claiming he told his company about his serious condition. At trial, Wilson’s lawyer argued that the company never called his doctors to determine why he was absent. The company appealed, noting that it couldn’t contact the doctors without violating the FMLA and arguing that it was wrong to tell the jury it should have. The employer won a new trial. (, No. 06-11422, 11th Cir., 2007)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/2375/you-cant-directly-call-doctor-for-fmla-information "
- Is it permissible to recover education reimbursements from final paychecks?
- Worker who can't perform her job isn't entitled to intermittent leave
- Severe but short-term conditions can qualify for ADA protection
- Grant maternity leave just as generously as you do other leave
- Settling the case was easy, until the IRS got involved