If your organization hits a busy time and needs employees to work long hours, don’t hesitate to require everyone to pitch in. Federal rules allow you to require to work overtime, so long as you pay them time-and-a-half for hours worked above 40 in a week.
You can terminate employees who refuse to work overtime unless they can show a legitimate legal reason for the refusal. That can include taking or , or needing to reduce hours as an ADA disability accommodation. Child care problems are not a legitimate reason to refuse OT.
Recent case: Kelly Economos worked for the Scotts Company as a dispatcher. During the spring busy period, the Scotts Company required employees to work far more than 40 hours per week, typically 55 or more.
Economos had young children and couldn’t make child care arrangements beyond her normal 40-hour schedule. So she refused to work the 55-hour schedule the company gave her. Scotts fired her and she sued, alleging sex discrimination. But the court tossed the case because she couldn’t show that males were given a break on . (Economos v. The Scotts Company, No. 05-271, ED PA, 2006)
Final note: Had Scotts allowed Economos to skip overtime, a male employee could have filed a sex discrimination lawsuit. That’s why it’s vital to apply the mandatory OT rules to everyone unless they have a legally covered reason.
- Turnabout is fair pay: EEOC broke overtime law
- Congrats on winning that bias case! That doesn't mean you won't owe attorneys' fees
- Associational discrimination: How close is close enough?
- More teens allege sexual harassment as the EEOC and media heighten awareness
- Male-dominated mailroom costs Star-Tribune $300,000