Just because an employee urges you to investigate alleged discrimination, don’t assume you have to treat that person with kid gloves. If it turns out that the complainer was actually the one causing the problems, you can—and should—take action.
Recent case: Anthony Keith, a black male, complained about race bias in promotions and provided the names of other black workers who could back him up. But those employees didn’t back him up. In fact, they said Keith had been sexually harassing them. After an investigation, the company fired Keith. He sued, claiming retaliation for his race-bias complaint. The court tossed out his case. (Keith v. MGA Inc., No. 06-12803, 11th Cir., 2006)
Bottom line: Employees may think they’re protected from any discipline if they get a complaint on record. Not true!
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/2273/what-to-do-when-complainer-is-actually-the-harasser "
- Settling a case? Make sure the agreement includes a ban on re-employment
- 7th Circuit: Under ADA, disabled don't automatically get vacant job
- Firing Guard or Reserve member? Better show you would have taken action despite service
- Check bankruptcy records when employees sue
- False move can revive expired claim—As retaliation