Remind your managers: Contrary to popular belief, female employees don't need to be pregnant to earn legal protections under the federal(PDA). Even nonpregnant employees can sue.
Instruct supervisors about the PDA's broad reach. Explain that you can't refuse a job or a promotion to a female employee simply because of her potential to become pregnant. It's your responsibility to manage schedule changes due to an employee's pregnancy, just as you would for any employee who has a temporary disability.
Recent case: Nurse Suzanne Kocak resigned after suffering medical complications from pregnancy. After she recovered, she twice reapplied for open positions but wasn't rehired.
Kocak filed a PDA lawsuit, claiming the company didn't rehire her because it feared a repeat of previous scheduling problems if she became pregnant again. As evidence, Kocak said a supervisor asked during her rehire interview whether she planned to have more children.
The company argued that Kocak shouldn't be protected under PDA because she wasn't pregnant at the time she was rejected for the job. A lower court bought that argument and sided with the company.
But a federal appeals court took issue with that reasoning, saying it didn't matter whether she was pregnant at the time of the lawsuit because the PDA also bans discrimination against a woman because of her "capacity to become pregnant." (Kocak v. Community Health Partners of Ohio, No. 03-4650, 6th Cir., 2005)
Final tip: Remind hiring managers that asking female applicants (or female employees) anything about their childbirth plans is a major legal "no no."
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- EEOC: Cleveland's Presrite was wrong not to hire women
- Fed contractors: New rules for documenting vets, disabled staff
- Do your pre-Hire tests carry lawsuit risks? New EEOC guidance helps make the call
- How to avoid the salary negotiation trap