A “protected” applicant is an individual with one or more of the characteristics defined by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (race, color, sex, national origin, religion), is age 40 or older or has a disability.
If any of your application procedures tends to screen out certain classes of applicants (such as women or the disabled) in a way that has nothing to do with the essential functions of the job, you could be sued for discrimination.
Also, some states and municipalities have laws against discrimination based on sexual preference. Check the laws in your area. If such statutes are on the books, then gay and lesbian applicants, to the extent you can identify them, are protected candidates as well.
That’s the case even if you didn’t intend to disqualify such applicants. And that’s where it can be tricky for employers. Consider the Immigration Reform and Control Act and the ADA. An employer may be trying to follow those laws to the letter and yet unknowingly violate key provisions.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/2197/protected-job-applicants "
- May we terminate a disabled employee who can't perform an essential function?
- Failing to track FMLA leave requests erases your right to challenge time off
- The HR I.Q. Test: January '10
- Should you encourage job candidates to reject other job offers?
- Worker settled case? Beware providing bad references that could lead to retaliation claims