In 1998 the Supreme Court issued its first ruling on an issue related to AIDS and its first major interpretation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The justices made it clear that all persons who are HIV-positive, even though they may show no overt symptoms of the disease, are protected under the ADA. Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U.S. 624 (1998)
Lower courts had long held that people infected with full-blown AIDS are protected by the ADA. Based on the Supreme Court’s Bragdon ruling, employers must afford the same protection to workers or applicants who are HIV-positive but show no outward signs of the infection.
Note: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one in 16 employers with 50 or fewer employees, as well as one in six large employers, has “experienced” an employee who is HIV-positive or has AIDS.
Caution: The ADA prevents you from asking workers about their HIV status or what medications they are taking. It is also illegal to deny a job or health insurance to applicants because they are HIV-positive.
Your best bet: Avoid even the appearance of discrimination. Follow these guidelines:
• If your insurance pool requires blood tests for classifying covered employees, have everyone take the same test. Then make sure that managers who are making hiring decisions don’t have access to test results.
• Don’t ask medical questions during interviews. If an applicant volunteers that he or she is HIV-positive, just say, “We don’t need to discuss that at this time.”
• Keep medical records private, and store them away from regular personnel files.
• Establish a company policy on HIV and AIDS. Educate employees about HIV transmission.
• Consult a lawyer before making any employment decision related to HIV or AIDS.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- How to Write Meeting Minutes
- USERRA: Another worry when using independent contractors
- Terminating after FMLA leave expires? Be sure to apply rule consistently
- Changing hiring criteria in midstream: Legal, if done right
- Court: You must act to prevent harassment