Wal-Mart fired truck driver Joseph Tracz after he tested positive for drugs. When he applied for another job, Tracz signed an authorization form allowing Wal-Mart to release his past drug tests. After failing to get the new job, he sued Wal-Mart for negligence, saying Wal-Mart should have released only results of certain tests required by the Transportation Department.
In refusing to rule for Tracz without a trial, the state appeals court said the authorization form was unclear about which test results should be released. (Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Tracz, No. 5D00-2649, Fla. Ct. App., 2001)
Advice: Make sure all forms authorizing you to release information are clear and legal. Also, have all new hires sign a release that gives you the right to respond truthfully to potential employer inquiries and waives legal claims that may arise out of giving references.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/21227/sidestep-liability-when-releasing-information-on-ex-employees "