If you fail to do background checks on applicants for certain positions, you could make yourself vulnerable to a negligent-hiring lawsuit by any worker or customer who’s been hurt by a violent employee. You should check applicants’ backgrounds for positions such as day care worker, security guard and sales representative.
A number of court decisions have established the principle that an employer has a “duty of care” to protect workers, customers and clients from injury caused by an unfit employee who an employer knew (or reasonably could have been expected to know) posed a risk.
For an employer to be held liable for negligent hiring, the plaintiff must prove that (1) an employee intentionally injured a co-worker, customer or client; (2) few, if any, pre-employment checks were performed, and that if they had been, those checks would have likely revealed a worker’s propensity toward violent behavior; or (3) the employer, knowing a worker’s propensity toward violence, did not provide proper supervision and security.
The following cases illustrate the hazards of negligent hiring. Both involve situations in which an employee injured a third party by an intentional tort.
During a mere seven months with Putnam General in West Virginia, Dr. John King, osteopathic surgeon, generated lawsuits from 122 patients alleging he injured them during surgery. In a Putnam County Circuit Court trial, a jury found the hospital guilty of “wantonness, recklessness and gross negligence” in the way it reviewed King’s qualifications before offering him a position on staff. The ruling allowed plaintiffs in the numerous suits against him to recover punitive as well as compensatory damages.
Putnam General argued that it would have taken the FBI to uncover all of King’s past lies and mistakes. The hospital had done a thorough job of examining King’s credentials, the defense argued, but all of the documents surrounding their decision had been lost. That loss, the judge said during jury instructions, was critical to the case.
Faced with the prospect of multiple millions in damages, Hospital Corporation of America, which owned Putnam General, decided to close the facility.
One of the largest judgments in a child sexual abuse suit involved negligent hiring by the Roman Catholic Church. A Long Island jury awarded $11.45 million in damages to a young man and woman who were repeatedly raped by youth minister, Michael Maiello, as teenagers. The jury deliberated for a full week before finding the Diocese of Rockville Centre, a church in East Meadow and its pastor guilty of “reckless disregard for the safety of others in the negligent hiring and retention” of Maiello. They held the church and pastor liable for 30% of the damages, which meant they would be responsible for the entire amount if Maiello couldn’t foot his part of the bill.
Note: Because the exact standards for a finding of negligent hiring vary from state to state, you should check with an employment attorney familiar with negligence law in your state. An attorney can help you establish policies for proper background checks that comply with employment laws and protect you from liability.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/2095/negligent-hiring "
- Beware desperate 'whistle-blower': Document reason for firing to stop retaliation claim
- What's our duty to accommodate a religious need we just learned about?
- High court says Labor Dept. right to limit overtime for some
- Follow new recipe for cafeteria plans
- Burden now on employees to show age bias caused adverse action