When employees return from, they're entitled to their same or equivalent position, pay and working conditions. If you try to place someone in a lower paying or lower-prestige job, you must document your decision very carefully. And even then, a court could view your actions as retaliation against the employee for taking leave.
For example, a credit union's marketing vice president tooktime off for "work-related stress." Upon his return, the company said it had restructured. Now, his position had fewer duties and paid $20,000 less. He quickly filed a lawsuit, citing . The credit union had less-than-convincing evidence that it was truly "restructuring." A jury will now decide whether the restructuring was genuine.
Advice: Follow yourin good faith and be leery of changing employees' pay, position or job conditions right after they return from FMLA leave. Retaliation claims are often easier to prove than violations of the underlying employment law. To avoid retaliation claims, it's best to put some time between the FMLA leave and the job action.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Supreme Court makes it harder for employees to win age-bias lawsuits
- Accommodate disabled workers, but don't alter main job functions
- Retaliation long after employee complained? Courts skeptical when years pass without incident
- Sample Policy: At-Will Employment