Just because an employee takesto deal with a serious health condition doesn’t mean he’s disabled under the ADA—and therefore entitled to reasonable accommodations when he returns to work.
Employers must consider each employee’s situation individually. Only workers with physical or mental impairments that substantially limit one or more major life activities generally qualify for ADA accommodations.
Advice: Before jumping to the conclusion that a returning employee is entitled to whatever accommodation he requests, ask yourself whether he is, in fact, disabled. What counts is his condition at the time he requests the accommodation.
Look at a range of life activities like working, breathing, walking, thinking, sleeping and socializing. Then try to determine whether the claimed problems are outside the wide range of “normal” for most people in the general population.
Recent case: John Bialko worked as a forklift operator at a Stokely-Van Camp facility. He was first diagnosed with panic and generalized anxiety disorders in 2002.
Bialko left the plant one day via ambulance after suffering a severe panic attack that rendered him unable to stand and made his heart race. He ended up takingand other leave. Then his doctor certified that he was ready to come back to work as long as he didn’t work more than 40 hours per week. According to his doctors, working longer hours might induce anxiety.
The company took the certification as a request for reasonable accommodations, but turned it down. It reasoned that merely being unable to work overtime did not make Bialko disabled. Bialko sued, alleging he was in fact disabled.
A lower court rejected his claim and he appealed. The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the lower court that Bialko could not claim he was disabled merely because he was limited to 40-hour workweeks.
It carefully analyzed whether Bialko was substantially limited on one or more major life activities. He was not when it came to the major life activity of working because he could do many jobs that don’t require overtime.
Bialko tried to tell the court he also was limited in his ability to socialize. His wife testified that Bialko really didn’t like to leave the house by himself and didn’t want to socialize in large groups. The court said that hardly described someone outside normal ranges of social behavior. It dismissed his appeal. (Bialko v. The Quaker Oats Company, et al., No. 10-2273, 3rd Cir., 2011)
Final note: Don’t forget that New Jersey has its own disability law. In some aspects it is broader than the ADA.
Run your disability concerns by your attorney before rejecting a reasonable accommodations request. If you do decide to make an accommodation, remember that it can be on your terms. The choice of accommodations is up to the employer.
Finally, remember that if an employee has used up available FMLA or other, he may still be eligible for more time off as a reasonable accommodation if it is clear he has a disability and more time off could allow an eventual return to work.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/20059/is-that-employee-really-disabled-making-the-ada-call-requires-careful-analysis "