If you intend to use arbitration as a way to manage employment discrimination claims and avoid court, make sure the agreement is reasonable. The more one-sided the agreement appears, the more likely a court will rule it unconscionable and unenforceable.
Recent case: Sharon Zullo worked for a newspaper and signed an acknowledgment that she had seen the company’s arbitration agreement and would adhere to it. The agreement bound only her. The newspaper was free to sue her in state or federal court if it chose.
Zullo alleged she had been discriminated against and sued.
The paper said the case should go to arbitration. The court disagreed and kept the case. It reasoned the agreement was so in favor of the employer that it was unfair and unconscionable (Zullo v. Inland Valley Publishing, No. H036242, Court of Appeal of California, 2011)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Accommodation can include FMLA leave to avoid OT
- Federal HR pros, take note: Bias complainers may contact any EEO officer to press claims
- Origin not the sole factor in national-Origin discrimination
- Consistent policy, smart response get you off the hook for retaliation