It’s expensive to cover an absent employee’s health insurance premiums when he is on—especially if he has family coverage. However, the law requires employers to do so. Few employees could take leave without it.
What happens if the employee doesn’t return? In some cases, employers can demand reimbursement for the premiums it paid. That’s true except if the employee doesn’t come back because he or she is still sick or has to continue to care for a sick relative.
Recent case: Zane Holder worked as a corrections officer for the Illinois Department of Corrections. His wife suffered from a “chronic mood disorder and substance abuse disorder” because of an opiate dependency. Holder applied forleave to help his wife with treatment. During that time off, the agency paid Holder’s health insurance premiums.
Once his FMLA leave was over, he applied for more time off, since his wife had not yet recovered fully. His leave was extended, but the state began recouping its insurance premium payments through wage garnishment.
Holder sued, alleging this was not legal.
The court agreed. While employees who don’t return to work for unrelated reasons following FMLA leave can be required to repay the premiums, that’s not the case if the failure to return is due to continuation of the medical condition that required leave in the first place. (Holder v. Illinois Department of Corrections, No. 09-CV-1082, SD IL, 2011)
- EEOC offers new guidance to avoid bias against employee/caregivers
- How to prepare your workplace for a possible flu pandemic
- Rx for drug testing: A firm policy, legal knowledge
- Ensure handbook doesn't make FMLA promises you can't keep
- Feel free to deny employees' FMLA leave requests that aren't legitimate under the law