It’s expensive to cover an absent employee’s health insurance premiums when he is on—especially if he has family coverage. However, the law requires employers to do so. Few employees could take leave without it.
What happens if the employee doesn’t return? In some cases, employers can demand reimbursement for the premiums it paid. That’s true except if the employee doesn’t come back because he or she is still sick or has to continue to care for a sick relative.
Recent case: Zane Holder worked as a corrections officer for the Illinois Department of Corrections. His wife suffered from a “chronic mood disorder and substance abuse disorder” because of an opiate dependency. Holder applied forleave to help his wife with treatment. During that time off, the agency paid Holder’s health insurance premiums.
Once his FMLA leave was over, he applied for more time off, since his wife had not yet recovered fully. His leave was extended, but the state began recouping its insurance premium payments through wage garnishment.
Holder sued, alleging this was not legal.
The court agreed. While employees who don’t return to work for unrelated reasons following FMLA leave can be required to repay the premiums, that’s not the case if the failure to return is due to continuation of the medical condition that required leave in the first place. (Holder v. Illinois Department of Corrections, No. 09-CV-1082, SD IL, 2011)
- When reasonable accommodation is time off, it's OK to count it as FMLA leave
- 4 steps to bullet-proof your employee handbook
- A good reference for a good worker, even though we fired him?
- Failing to track FMLA leave requests erases your right to challenge time off
- You can demand that employees respond to FMLA leave questions