If economic conditions force you to downsize, be prepared for lawsuits. That's especially true if no employees stand out as obvious poor performers who should be canned. In such cases, articulate that you have no choice but to fire "the worst of the best." Usethat were prepared before the downsizing to justify your choices. That makes it hard for lawyers to paint a discriminatory picture.
Recent case: When MetLife targeted its data-analysis division for a rif, it selected the lowest-ranking employees for termination. The company selected Anthony Marione, even though he was performing at acceptable levels. He sued, alleging age bias, but the 3rd Circuit tossed out the case. Reason: Marione couldn't point to any evidence that MetLife's stated reason for his selection (to eliminate the "worst of the best") was a pretext for age discrimination. (Marione v. MetLife, No. 05-2359, 2006)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/1920/firing-worst-of-the-best-isnt-age-discrimination "
- Get ready now! New ADAAA regs will mean more litigation
- Employee 'had a hunch' about bias? That's not enough to support retaliation suit
- Title VII doesn't protect employees who complain about discrimination against customers
- Ohio Supreme Court narrows right to file wrongful discharge claim
- Texas agencies face federal sex discrimination lawsuits