Employees who claim they were transferred as punishment for complaining won’t get far if they sue. That’s because courts recognize an employers’ right to manage its work force, and that minor changes in job duties aren’t enough to justify a lawsuit.
Recent case: Correctional counselor Robert Hart, who is white, wanted to work at another facility, but a black woman was transferred instead. Hart complained, but was then moved to a new job that came with additional responsibilities. Hart sued, alleging that he was being punished for complaining.
The U.S. Bureau of Prisons argued that there were only minor differences between the positions, and Hart hadn’t lost any pay, benefits or promotion opportunities. That was enough for the court to toss out the case. (Hart v. Attorney General, No. 10-13628, 11th Cir., 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/19041/minor-job-changes-dont-make-transfer-adverse-action "
- Title VII's silence on gay bias doesn't give OK to discriminate
- EEOC offers new guidance to avoid bias against employee/caregivers
- Can arbitration agreements include clause waiving employees' statutory claims?
- Chicago hotel to pay $90,000 to settle disability bias case
- Don't tolerate employees' abuse of union rights