It’s not the end of the world if you receive an EEOC decision that says your organization discriminated against an employee. The decision isn’t binding and courts often don’t grant much weight to such a determination.
Recent case: Ramon Young was fired from his job with FedEx after a customer complained that Young had left a package without getting the customer’s signature. When FedEx investigated, it found that Young had falsified other signatures.
Young filed an EEOC complaint and the commission agreed he may have been discriminated against by being treated more harshly than others.
But the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld dismissal of the case. It reasoned that, while the EEOC’s opinion might have been relevant, it didn’t have to be admitted and it certainly wasn’t binding. It said Young hadn’t shown he was treated differently because of race. (Young v. FedEx, No. 10-15635, 11th Cir., 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/19038/eeocs-bias-decision-doesnt-bind-federal-court "
- Hypersensitive employee doesn't get special protection
- 'Association' with disabled no automatic assurance of leave
- EEOC record race-Bias case sends 'Powerful message'
- 'That head scarf thing': Insensitive comments spark legal fire
- Beware ill-chosen words, which--all by themselves--can sometimes launch lawsuits