It doesn’t take much for a work environment to become hostile enough to prompt an employee’s sexual harassment lawsuit. And if many incidents occur over time—or even if a handful of offenses are severe enough—the employee may have a winning case.
That’s why you must act fast upon the first reported incident to stop further problems.
Recent case: Sandra Brown-Baumbach worked as a loan financing manager for just four months before she quit in disgust over working conditions. She claimed co-workers and at least one supervisor created a sexually hostile work environment.
Brown-Baumbach recounted 10 separate incidents that she considered sexual harassment. One incident involved a supervisor who suggested that if Brown-Baumbach’s cousin, who was coming in for an interview, wore high heels, she would automatically be hired.
Then, after her supervisor sold a new car to an exotic dancer, he helped the customer move items from her old car to the new one. When he found a pair of “stripper heels” in the back seat, he held them up for Brown-Baumbach and said, “Sandy, look, these are what turn me on.”
Among the remaining incidents was a text message sent by a supervisor about Brown-Baumbach to another employee who asked whether she was wearing underwear that day.
Finally, Brown-Baumbach quit and sued.
The trial court dismissed her sexual harassment case, reasoning that the incidents, though perhaps unpleasant, weren’t severe enough to create a sexually hostile work environment.
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. It concluded that a jury should decide whether the 10 incidents were severe enough to create a hostile environment. (Brown-Baumbach v. B&B Automotive, No. 10-3351, 3rd Cir., 2011)
- Stop lawsuits by double-teaming hiring process
- Complying with the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act
- Pair of cases shows how you can legally use arbitration, but standards are high
- Settlement ends Minnesota Senate's lurid lawsuit
- Hiring or promoting? OK to discount experience if it's trumped by other factors