Act ASAP to end sexually hostile environment — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily

Act ASAP to end sexually hostile environment

Get PDF file

by on
in Discrimination and Harassment,Human Resources

It doesn’t take much for a work environment to become hostile enough to prompt an employee’s sexual harassment lawsuit. And if many incidents occur over time—or even if a handful of offenses are severe enough—the employee may have a winning case.

That’s why you must act fast upon the first reported incident to stop further problems.

Recent case: Sandra Brown-Baumbach worked as a loan financing manager for just four months before she quit in disgust over working conditions. She claimed co-workers and at least one supervisor created a sexually hostile work environment.

Brown-Baumbach recounted 10 separate incidents that she considered sexual harassment. One incident involved a supervisor who suggested that if Brown-Baumbach’s cousin, who was coming in for an interview, wore high heels, she would automatically be hired.

Then, after her supervisor sold a new car to an exotic dancer, he helped the customer move items from her old car to the new one. When he found a pair of “stripper heels” in the back seat, he held them up for Brown-Baumbach and said, “Sandy, look, these are what turn me on.”

Among the remaining incidents was a text message sent by a supervisor about Brown-Baumbach to another employee who asked whether she was wearing underwear that day.

Finally, Brown-Baumbach quit and sued.

The trial court dismissed her sexual harassment case, reasoning that the incidents, though perhaps unpleasant, weren’t severe enough to create a sexually hostile work environment.

The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. It concluded that a jury should decide whether the 10 incidents were severe enough to create a hostile environment. (Brown-Baumbach v. B&B Automotive, No. 10-3351, 3rd Cir., 2011)

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: