When employees carry a chip on their shoulders, they may see discrimination in acts that are simply normal workplace behavior. Fortunately, courts won’t allow discrimination cases to go to trial if they’re based on nothing more than vague “feelings.”
Recent case: Jeffrey Thompson, who is black, worked as a quality control manager for Red Bull Racing, a NASCAR team. About a year into his employment, his bosses began complaining about his performance and the overall quality of the parts being produced by employees under Thompson’s.
Thompson was demoted to quality technician, although he continued to receive the same salary. Then Thompson enrolled in college.
Over the next few months, he began missing work as he left early to attend classes or do homework. Red Bull Racing told Thompson his attendance was unacceptable and that he had to treat his job as his primary responsibility.
That spurred him to send a long note to HR complaining that he was being discriminated against. He included allegations that his supervisors had a “plantation” mentality that required blacks to “put the master and the plantation above all else.” He also attributed the team’s attitude toward his college work as racially motivated and an effort to keep blacks from getting an education.
He was fired shortly after forand attendance problems. Thompson sued, claiming racial discrimination and that he had been fired for complaining.
The court tossed out his case. It noted that while the team viewed its work as more important than Thompson’s efforts to improve himself, there was no evidence that its views were based on race. (Thompson v. Red Bull Racing, No. 1:10-CV-135, WD NC, 2011)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Counter bias claims: Show how your rational promotion process selects best candidates
- Draft bulletproof waiver deals with 6 court-approved benchmarks
- Average evaluations and lateral transfers may not be discriminatory
- Accepting suspension doesn't equal admission of guilt