Vendors, customers and employees had complained about Jane Sturdivan, a 59-year-old office manager. But her fate was sealed when a 24-year-old office accountant said he could no longer work with Sturdivan and threatened to quit. Instead of losing the young accountant, the company fired Sturdivan, saying the accountant was simply more valuable to the company.
Sturdivan sued for age and sex discrimination but lost. "This is no more than a simple business decision which, good or bad, courts will not second-guess," the 10th Circuit said. (Sturdivan v. Tri-State Feeders, Inc., 10th Cir., No. 98-6412, 2000)
Advice: Never sugarcoat the truth about a dismissal, it will allow the fired employee to raise doubts about your motive. In this case, the employer's plain speaking made short shrift of Sturdivan's case. She provided no evidence that the explanation given was a pretext for discrimination.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- How to Write Meeting Minutes
- Home builder pays $45K to resolve sex bias suit
- 3M wins class-action decertification—for now
- Supremes hear arguments: For Title VII, who's a supervisor?
- Not picked for unpaid additional duties? That's not grounds for discrimination suit