When a financial services firm terminates an employee, it must file a Form U-5 outlining the reasons for the firing. While those statements have some immunity, the immunity dissolves if the fired employee can show the statements were malicious.
That's what happened when a former compliance director claimed that his U-5 included false and derogatory statements. A federal district court upheld an arbitration panel's $100,000 punitive damage award, plus $40,535 in compensation and interest. (Acciardo v. Millennium Securities Corp., 99 Civ. 3371, S.D. N.Y., 2000).
Advice: When completing any documents that explain a firing, not just U-5s, you may feel an urge to justify your actions by embellishing the reasons. Don't do it. Stick to the verifiable facts. Any overreaching statements will blow up in your face if they get into court.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/1570/dont-embellish-reasons-for-firing "
- What should we do? Client asked us not to assign employee who is now out on workers' comp
- N.C. workers can cite 'public policy' violations in wrongful discharge cases
- St. Vincent Hospital fires worker over threatening note
- 'At-will' clause doesn't turn contractor into employee
- Supreme Court expands filing window in 'Section 1981' cases