Brian Snapp's boss fired him after finding out Snapp had complained to the U.S. Labor Department that the company violated federal wage laws. A jury awarded Snapp $200 in overtime pay, $1,000 in lost wages and $35,000 in punitive damages because of the retaliation. It recommended that the supervisor who fired him pay 30 percent of the punitive damages.
But the 11th Circuit threw out the punitive damages, saying they aren't allowed for retaliation under the. The 11th Circuit encompasses Alabama, Florida and Georgia. (Snapp v. Unlimited Concepts Inc., No. 98-2936, 11th Cir., 2000)
Employers in the 7th Circuit (Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin) aren't so lucky. Their appeals court is the only other federal circuit to rule on the issue, and it says punitive damages are allowed in FLSA cases.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/1545/courts-split-on-damages-for-flsa-retaliation "
- Don't invite EEOC to fish through your files
- Erase ideas of 'implied contract' with repeated at-will statements
- Use an 'accuracy statement' to sniff out applicants' lies
- OK to punish employees for disruptive acts--even if done in the context of protesting bias
- Workers' comp claim can't be basis for Title VII retaliation