Think you can close the book on an employment lawsuit once you’ve paid off the jury verdict? Think again. As a new ruling shows, the court can still have its claws around your organization’s throat for a long time …
Case in Point: Two teen employees of an IHOP restaurant in Racine, Wis., filed sexual harassment claims with the EEOC. They won a verdict of $105,000.
But the court added another caveat to the verdict: It required the owners to post a notice of the jury verdict in a conspicuous location in all 17 of the franchise’s restaurants. The court intended to make sure other employees knew about the unacceptable behavior and the remedies available to them through the EEOC.
The owners refused to post the notice, claiming that doing so would cause “irreparable harm” to the franchise.
Too bad, said the court. It held the owners in contempt of court and fined them $1,000 for each day the notices weren’t posted in all 17 locations.
“Posting notices in sexual harassment cases is important because the notices increase the odds that any victims of illegal activity will know their rights and that they can always complain to the EEOC,” says Jean Kamp, the EEOC’s associate regional attorney for Milwaukee. (EEOC v.Hospitality of Racine Inc., E.D. Wis.)
Lessons learned: Post your anti-harassment policy. It’s more proactive than to have to reactively post a notice with a sexual harassment verdict against you. And post whatever the court tells you to post. Or, it will cost you big time.
Individually, the courts and the EEOC are powerful entities. Together they are a superpower.
- Court: Applicants must apply first before they sue for hiring discrimination
- Investigative finger points back at accuser? It's OK to fire
- Don't tell employee's new boss about his prior complaints
- Study spots patterns in New York discrimination litigation
- When serial harasser strikes, you can't just move victims