An African-American worker claimed he "accidentally" turned on a tape recorder in his duffel bag that just happened to catch two co-workers making racial comments about him in the break room. The two co-workers were fired when the tape went public.
The two fired employees sued based on the federal Wiretap Act, which prohibits the use of intercepted communications if there's reason to believe the information was illegally recorded. The 4th Circuit dismissed the suit, saying the accidental taping scenario was credible. (Weeks v. Union Camp Corp., No. 98-2814, 4th Cir., 2000)
Advice: Don't think this case gives you the green light to use a secret tape recording to prove discrimination. This type of illicit taping wouldn't fly in court too often. In addition to the federal Wiretap Act, most states have wiretapping statutes. In this case, the court was obviously trying to bend over backward to uphold the firing of these two workers.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/1488/dont-trip-over-wiretap-laws "