A former car dealership employee won an Americans with Disabilities Act case and a $1.05 million jury award for lost back wages, lost future wages and mental distress. The dealership then asked that the award be reduced, based on a 1991 law that caps damages at $100,000 for such midsize companies. But the judge refused. Reason: The cap applies only to the amount of an award that applies to emotional pain and suffering. Back pay and front pay are not limited under the cap. And because the dealership's lawyer goofed by not asking that the award be broken down by type of damages, those under the cap and those not, the judge let the full award stand. (Pals v. Schepel Buick & GMC Truck Inc., No. 99-3551, 7th Cir., 2000)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/1486/lost-the-case-ask-for-damages-to-be-spelled-out "
- Prompt cleanup, spot inspections are the keys to curing racially hostile environment
- Ignore job applicants' claims of 'good health'
- Court curbs NYDHR's jurisdiction on harassment, bias cases
- Detail discipline so you can later explain why punishment was appropriate and fair
- Document any slippage in employee performance to insulate against later discrimination claims