Here’s a case that shows you can’t have it both ways.
A Texas appeals court has concluded that an employer can’t enforce an employment contract against an employee when that contract specifies that the employee remains an at-will employee.
Recent case: Renuka Polimera immigrated to the United States and wanted to stay. She got a job with Chemtex, an environmental testing company that often sponsors immigrants and helps them get their green cards.
After working for the company for a while and beginning the immigration process, Polimera signed a contract with Chemtex that stated she remained an at-will employee, but also said that if she left within two years of getting her green card, she would owe the company $20,000.
Chemtex terminated Polimera for cause and then sued her for the money.
The court said the contract wasn’t valid. It reasoned that an at-will employee is free to quit anytime, and holding an at-will employee to a specific time period means she’s not at-will. That contradiction made the contract invalid. (Polimera v. Chemtex, No. 09-00361, Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Final note: Always have an experienced attorney prepare employment contracts. Employers that rely on forms or try to draft contract documents themselves can get into real trouble. A contract that isn’t valid is worthless. What’s more, the time and money spent litigating its validity are wasted.
- What factors should we weigh when deciding whether to offer severance package?
- Make sure all medical tests you require are truly job-related and necessary
- Head off harassment suits: Review all firings
- DOL enlists states to conduct more misclassification audits
- New York amends Human Rights Law to protect unpaid interns