Think every arbitration decision is final? Think again. Arbitration agreements can allow a court to review the decision, as long as both parties agreed.
Recent case: Nafta Traders terminated Margaret Quinn, its vice president of operations, claiming worsening business conditions. She sued, alleging sex discrimination.
Nafta demanded arbitration, since the employee handbook called for it. The arbitration agreement included limited judicial review.
Quinn won in arbitration and demanded her money—almost $200,000. That’s when Nafta appealed to a state court, asking for a review.
The Texas Supreme Court said the company had that right, but also limited Nafta’s appeal to the records and evidence already presented at arbitration. (Nafta Traders v. Quinn, No. 08-0613, Supreme Court of Texas, 2011)
- Understand how whistle-blower laws affect employers, employees
- Union says Honeywell's lockout costs more than concessions
- May we terminate a disabled employee who can't perform an essential function?
- When employee sues for discrimination, be prepared to show your processes are solid
- Professional Building Systems settles racial harassment case