In January, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Thompson v. North American Stainless that it’s retaliation to fire someone because his fiancée complained about discrimination. Since then, courts have had to reconsider the idea that only the original complainant can sue for retaliation.
Recent case: Manuel Zamora and his son Christopher are Houston police officers. When Manuel spoke out against perceived bias, Christopher claimed he was punished by missing out on promotions.
They both sued and the court dismissed Christopher’s claim because he wasn’t the original complainant.
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s dismissal. It reasoned that under the Supreme Court’s Thompson ruling, punishing a close relative, such as a son, may be retaliation. (Zamora v. City of Houston, No. 10-20625, 5th Cir., 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/14778/punishing-son-for-fathers-complaint-is-retaliation "
- Disclaimer can counter employment-contract argument
- Transfer—without penalty—won't make a retaliation suit
- Promises, promises: Put incentives in writing; don't let managers blurt them out
- 2012 enforcement trends in employment law: hiring and safety
- Could a court order force us to compromise our employees' privacy?