When making an employment decision (such as firing, hiring, demotion), it's important for your words and actions to be consistent with your true reasons. It's equally vital that you document and provide witnesses for such decisions. The U.S. Supreme Court made this point clear in its recent decision in Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products Inc., an age discrimination case. (120 S. Ct. 2097)
Sound obvious? It's not. Many employers mistakenly believe it's better to say little or nothing at the time of decisions such as, or to offer a less confrontational reason for their actions to avoid offending the employee or provoking a lawsuit.
Taking the path of least resistance, however, may backfire.
Disbelief not enough
Under Reeves, if a court has reason to disbelieve your explanation, if only because of a feeling that you were unfair, insensitive or inconsistent, it could increase the risk of your bein...(register to read more)
- Can we use personal e-mails we discovered to defend against former employee's lawsuit?
- Employee complains and then quits? Investigate anyway, to prove what happened
- No employee 'right' to affair with subordinate
- Do the Math ... or EEOC Will Do It For You!
- Develop objective promotion criteria, stick with them—and be sure to document them