When making an employment decision (such as firing, hiring, demotion), it's important for your words and actions to be consistent with your true reasons. It's equally vital that you document and provide witnesses for such decisions. The U.S. Supreme Court made this point clear in its recent decision in Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products Inc., an age discrimination case. (120 S. Ct. 2097)
Sound obvious? It's not. Many employers mistakenly believe it's better to say little or nothing at the time of decisions such as, or to offer a less confrontational reason for their actions to avoid offending the employee or provoking a lawsuit.
Taking the path of least resistance, however, may backfire.
Disbelief not enough
Under Reeves, if a court has reason to disbelieve your explanation, if only because of a feeling that you were unfair, insensitive or inconsistent, it could increase the risk of your bein...(register to read more)
- Use 'Mini-Med' Benefits to Cut Costs, Help Retain Staff
- Easy way to head off discrimination suits: Have manager who hired also do the firing
- N.J. Supreme Court sets rules for proving religious discrimination
- Don't base hiring decisions on applicants' childbirth plans
- 10 unemployment compensation factors that affect payouts