When making an employment decision (such as firing, hiring, demotion), it's important for your words and actions to be consistent with your true reasons. It's equally vital that you document and provide witnesses for such decisions. The U.S. Supreme Court made this point clear in its recent decision in Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products Inc., an age discrimination case. (120 S. Ct. 2097)
Sound obvious? It's not. Many employers mistakenly believe it's better to say little or nothing at the time of decisions such as, or to offer a less confrontational reason for their actions to avoid offending the employee or provoking a lawsuit.
Taking the path of least resistance, however, may backfire.
Disbelief not enough
Under Reeves, if a court has reason to disbelieve your explanation, if only because of a feeling that you were unfair, insensitive or inconsistent, it could increase the risk of your bein...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- N.J. women join gender-pay class action against Lockheed
- Settlement may mean higher pay for pharma firm's N.J. women
- Applicants gone wild: Top 10 blunders by interviewees
- Follow basic rules for job descriptions, interviews to avoid hiring bias