In most cases, employees who file sexual harassment claims can’t add a host of other related claims. For example, an employee can’t add a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress if the behavior she describes was essentially sexual harassment.
That’s one less opportunity for an employee to win a large jury award.
Recent case: Beverly Freeman alleged that a co-worker made sexual comments, sent sexually suggestive and explicit links to her personal e-mail account, attempted to grab her buttocks, asked her out on dates and rubbed his hands on her thighs.
She sued under Illinois state law for sexual harassment and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The court tossed out her emotional distress claim, noting that nothing she described went beyond sexual harassment. Because there was no unrelated outrageous conduct, she couldn’t add the claim. (Freeman v. Holy Cross Hospital, No. 10-C-4157, ND IL, 2011)
- Court shoots down argument based on bizarre racism 'proof'
- Of good faith and gut instinct: Fire employee who falsely claims discrimination
- 'Hey, lady! That's a man's job!'
- Use peer-Review process to assess subjective qualities—And justify discipline
- Follow up with harassed employee to check for retaliation--and prevent future lawsuits