If you let employees ignore reasonable restrictions on how they use company e-mail and other communications tools, you may find yourself having to scramble to prevent embarrassing information from becoming public.
Recent case: Catherine Franklin was fired from her law firm job after she complained about a. E-mail quickly became the focal point. An internal investigation showed that Franklin and a co-worker used e-mail to discuss exchanging prescription drugs. Meanwhile, Franklin alleged she had received a pornographic e-mail from a firm attorney.
Franklin sued, alleging sexual harassment. Her lawsuit included graphic descriptions of the pornographic e-mail, which she claimed showed a partner engaged in sexual activity. The firm had to petition the court to block some of the content to avoid embarrassment and bad publicity. (Franklin v. Simon, Eddins & Greenstone, No. 3:10-CV-1581, ND TX, 2011)
- Zero tolerance policy means zip, says York County employee
- Employee is pregnant? You can still discipline or fire if she violates your policies
- Beware promises about schedules, retention that could create an employment contract
- New guidelines sound alarm on race, color bias
- Wisconsin fight: End of labor unions or a new beginning?