The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that to prove age discrimination, employees have to show that age was the sole reason for an adverse employment action. That usually means employees can’t claim that other types of discrimination were also in play.
Recent case: Anthony Prisco, who is 62, sued his employer, alleging that he was fired because of age and disability discrimination. His employer asked the court to toss out the case because someone can’t blame his firing on age bias while at the same time alleging disability discrimination as another reason.
The court said it would let Prisco’s case continue for now. However, it left open the possibility that, should a trial occur, Prisco might have to pick one claim or the other instead of arguing that he was discriminated on the basis of both age and disability discrimination. (Prisco v. Methodist Hospital, No. 10-3141, ED PA, 2011)
- It may be scandalous, but reporting co-worker sexual shenanigans isn't protected activity
- Follow the discipline rules in your handbook to defeat discrimination claims
- Promises, promises: Well-intentioned words may send fired employee in search of an attorney
- Another Manhattan chef stirs up a discrimination suit
- Supreme Court expands filing window in 'Section 1981' cases