The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that to prove age discrimination, employees have to show that age was the sole reason for an adverse employment action. That usually means employees can’t claim that other types of discrimination were also in play.
Recent case: Anthony Prisco, who is 62, sued his employer, alleging that he was fired because of age and disability discrimination. His employer asked the court to toss out the case because someone can’t blame his firing on age bias while at the same time alleging disability discrimination as another reason.
The court said it would let Prisco’s case continue for now. However, it left open the possibility that, should a trial occur, Prisco might have to pick one claim or the other instead of arguing that he was discriminated on the basis of both age and disability discrimination. (Prisco v. Methodist Hospital, No. 10-3141, ED PA, 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/14606/age-discrimination-claim-may-bar-other-claims "
- Workers hired through temp service? Normal anti-discrimination rules still apply
- Lessons from the firing line
- It cuts both ways: Be on guard for religious harassment that offends nonbelievers, too
- Jackson Park Hospital settles job segregation claim
- Hospital didn't discriminate during downsizing, court rules