Public employees—people working for government agencies and state colleges and universities—don’t lose their right to free speech just because they work for the government.
Discriminating against them because of what they say or believe may be seen as “viewpoint discrimination.” And that can mean lawsuits.
Recent case: Michael Adams is a tenured associate professor at the University of North Carolina–Wilmington, where he teaches criminology. After earning tenure, Adams became a Christian. His conversion changed not just his religious beliefs, but his ideological views.
He became a frequent commentator on the conservative lecture circuit and wrote a book on problems facing conservative Christians on college campuses. The book, Welcome to the Ivory Tower of Babel: Confessions of a Conservative College Professor, was a collection of his essays published in newspapers and online.
Adams was turned down for a promotion to full professor based on inadequate scholarly publications and service to the community. Adams saw this as an effort to punish him for his conservative Christian views. He sued.
The university argued that this case wasn’t about free speech. It likened the situation to one in which a public employee speaks out as part of his official duties. In one such case, a government attorney wrote a memo criticizing how his department was run. A court said that wasn’t protected speech, but a part of his job.
Likewise, the university argued that serving the community was part of a professor’s job and how he did that wasn’t an expression of free speech.
The court didn’t buy it. Instead, it said Adams should be able to sue for viewpoint discrimination. It said his views were protected speech. (Adams v. UNC, No. 10-1413, 4th Cir., 2011)
- When harassment allegations surface, launch comprehensive investigation right away
- Feel free to set punishment that fits the crime
- Prevent employee anger before it starts: 5 tips
- Is it legal to discipline an employee for tardiness by suspending her without pay?
- Women-hating comments, even if not sexual, can equal sexual harassment