When a young mother begins missing work, a manager may think she isn’t taking her career seriously enough. Expressing that sentiment may provoke your employee to sue.
Recent case: Heather Weightman had an attendance problem. When she returned fromand continued to miss work, her boss pulled her aside and told her, “You need to make a decision, either you are going to be a mom, or have a career.”
When she was later terminated for excessive unexcused absences, she sued, alleging sex and family-responsibility discrimination.
She based her case on the manager’s comments. Fortunately, absences entirely unrelated to her family responsibilities were excessive enough for the court to uphold the discharge despite the ill-advised comments. (Weightman v. Bank of New York Mellon, No. 09-0929, WD PA, 2011)
- Navigating the complexities of a layoff to avoid unnecessary risks
- Apply good judgment to legal considerations
- New pregnancy protections ring in the New Year in California
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act doesn't require accommodation of pregnancy complications
- Make sure absence policy doesn't clash with FMLA