by Michael W. Fox and Tom Barnard, Esqs.
The U.S. Supreme Court has held that an employee who was fired shortly after his fiancée filed a bias charge against their employer may sue for third-party retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
According to the court, the employee could be considered an “aggrieved person” under Title VII because he was “well within the zone of interests sought to be protected by Title VII.”
The case is Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP (No. 09–291, U.S. Supreme Court, 2011). (See “Supreme Court expands retaliation prohibitions.”)
Complaint, then a firing
Eric Thompson and his fiancée, Miriam Regalado, were employees of North American Stainless, LP (NAS). Three weeks after Regalado filed an EEOC sex discrimination charge against NAS, the company fired Thompson.
Thompson then sued NAS under Title VII, claiming the company fired him to retaliate against Regalado for filing her EEOC ...(register to read more)
- Small business retirement plans: Which is best for you?
- NJLAD allows personal liability for aiding and abetting
- Be patient and scrupulously fair when dealing with litigious employee who has complained
- Employee acts as own lawyer? Expect legal complications
- Cut retaliation liability risk by taking action on all harassment complaints