Employers are obligated to make sure their employees don’t discriminate. However, unions have no similar duty to investigate and expose bias.
Recent case: Richard Arrieta and other employees of Yellow Transportation sued their union local and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, alleging they didn’t investigate claims that the company discriminated against black and Hispanic employees.
The union said it didn’t have an independent duty to investigate discrimination—although it also pointed out that it actually had tried to do so in this case.
The court tossed out the case. It reasoned that, even if the union had a duty (which it did not), it had tried to respond to complaints but was rebuffed by the very employees who claimed discrimination. The workers had refused to provide specifics. (Arrieta, et al., v. Local 745, et al., No. 3:08-CV-1722, ND TX, 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/14313/unions-have-no-separate-duty-to-ferret-out-discrimination "
- When showing up for work is essential, you don't have to accommodate with lax schedule
- Will we get in trouble for disciplining an employee for disparaging Facebook postings?
- Ed Asner's rookie leader mistake
- Firing OK if employee falsely claims harassment
- Former Minnesota U.S. Attorney retaliated against whistle-blower