Spring cleaning? Be sure to dust off and update your. Pay attention to this important point: When it comes to discipline policies, give yourself some flexibility to deal with unusual circumstances.
Steer clear of complicated policies that try to categorize every conceivable offense for which employees could be fired. Such restrictive policies can inadvertently eliminate your at-will right to fire at your discretion.
Best practice: If yourpolicy includes a list of broad firing offenses, add a disclaimer that says something like, “These rules are guidelines only. The employer reserves the right to implement whatever level of discipline it believes is appropriate, up to and including termination, even on a first offense.”
Recent case: The discipline policy at the Forrest City, Ark., fire department required employees to behave well both on and off duty. The handbook specified a list of dischargeable offenses—including felony convictions. But it wisely also included a disclaimer saying the list was not exhaustive.
Firefighter Calvin Chism has a history of run-ins with the law. He’d been arrested for battery, domestic battery, assault and aggravated assault over the course of his career.
What well-intentioned document sitting patiently on your shelf is actually a ticking time-bomb? Read how a dusty, yellowed binder nearly brought down Lindsay’s company... Don't allow your employee handbook to be an open invitation to sue you: Bullet-Proof Your Employee Handbook today.
When Chism was arrested yet again—this time on charges of receiving stolen property—the department fired him.
That charge was eventually dropped, meaning Chism still had no felony convictions. That, he argued, meant he shouldn’t have been terminated. He sued, alleging race discrimination.
The court disagreed. Reason: The fire department’s handbook made clear that the examples of misconduct justifying discharge weren’t exhaustive. Plus, it required workers to exhibit good behavior. A history of repeated arrests violated that policy, even if none of the arrests led to a felony conviction. (Chism v. Curtner, et al., No. 09-2632, 8th Cir., 2010)
- Bias against applicants who never apply? Ruling in case involving criminal background checks
- Never link absences to employee's disabled relative
- Be flexible on deadlines after FMLA leave
- Don't cave to telecommuting request if it won't allow disabled employee to do job
- Beware behavior that 'poisons the well,' spawns discrimination lawsuits